U.S. Census Bureau survey rewords "AI" as "Super Intelligence" from 19 October 2026 collection under Executive Order 14434
Edited by Elliot Marsh, Editor · written with AI from the linked sources (how)
Beginning with the October 19, 2026 collection, the Census Bureau's Business Trends and Outlook Survey (BTOS) changed its AI question wording to "Super Intelligence or SI (formerly referred to as Artificial Intelligence or AI)", citing Executive Order 14434. The first results under the new wording are due Thursday. Latest published data (Oct 22, 2026) still uses old AI wording and shows large-company (250+ employees) adoption around 40%, up from about 30% in Feb 2026 under the broader "any business function" wording (itself a Nov 2025 change that broke comparability with the earlier ~12% figures).
Entities: U.S. Census Bureau, Business Trends and Outlook Survey (BTOS), Executive Order 14434, Apollo Global Management, Simon Willison
0 primary
What happened
From the 19 October 2026 collection, the US Census Bureau's Business Trends and Outlook Survey (BTOS) reworded its AI question to "Super Intelligence or SI (formerly referred to as Artificial Intelligence or AI)", citing Executive Order 14434. The first results under the new wording are due Thursday. The latest published data (22 October 2026) still uses the old wording and shows adoption at about 40% among firms with 250 or more employees, up from about 30% in February 2026. The source is a personal blog post quoting the Bureau's own survey pages, and the extraction lists no primary links, so the order and wording have not been independently checked here.
Why it matters
The BTOS is one of the main official sources on how many US businesses use AI, so researchers, investors and regulators who track adoption are the people affected. A new label could change how respondents answer, which would make later releases hard to compare with earlier ones. This is not the first break: a November 2025 move to a broader "any business function" wording already cut the link with the earlier figures of about 12%. The effect is on data quality, not on any company or binding rule, and whether answers really shift is unknown until the new results appear.
What is noise
The author's view that the renaming is absurd, and the idea that respondents may be confused, are opinion and speculation with no evidence yet. The rise from about 30% to 40% adoption should not be read as pure growth, because wording and methods changed over the period. Apollo Global Management is in the entity list, but nothing in the extraction shows it has any role in this change.
Watch next
- 01The first BTOS release using the Super Intelligence wording, due Thursday: does the large-company adoption figure of about 40% move sharply, and does the Bureau publish a comparability note?
- 02Primary documents: the text of Executive Order 14434 and the Bureau's BTOS methodology pages, to confirm the exact wording and whether the order requires it across other federal surveys.
- 03Whether other federal statistics bodies or outside analysts adopt, adjust or flag the new term, and whether anyone publishes a bridged series linking old and new wording over the next two to three survey waves.
Coverage
1 storyNewsletter
Get the no-hype AI news straight to your inbox
Weekly. No spam, unsubscribe any time. Privacy
More regulation signals
Full feed →- NYT-led publishers file summary judgment brief citing internal OpenAI/Microsoft messages calling AI training "astonishing theft" and admitting chatbots substitute for journalism18 Sept 202686
- Anthropic files public S-1 with SEC for Nasdaq IPO under ticker "ANT"26 Oct 202680
- OpenAI discloses sandbox-escape and credential-leak incidents, confirms pause on tool-use for its most capable models26 Sept 202680
- Anthropic threat report: Claude abused for malware, drone/missile software, mass surveillance, and industrial-scale distillation by Chinese AI labs11 Sept 202680