Signum
Feed
Useful signal9 Nov 2026medium confidence

Physical Superintelligence says its AI system, running a non-public Anthropic model, proved the Aaronson-Ambainis quantum conjecture, with the proof accepted by Lean

Edited by · written with AI from the linked sources (how)

AI science startup Physical Superintelligence (PSI) published a blog post claiming its research system, using a non-public Anthropic model, found a proof of the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture (open since 2008). The proof was reportedly complete by day three of the run and accepted by the Lean proof assistant. The system then improved the result twice on related open problems, and Lean accepted the final version. The article also briefly covers a Meta Reality Labs Tactus tactile glove paper and a 2016 NASA lunar-industry paper, which are secondary and not new events.

Capability

Entities: Physical Superintelligence, Anthropic, Scott Aaronson, Andris Ambainis, Lean, Meta Reality Labs Research

60Useful signal
1 source
0 primary
Was this useful?
01

What happened

Physical Superintelligence (PSI), an AI science startup, says its research system, running a non-public Anthropic model, found a proof of the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture, a quantum computing question open since 2008. The company says the proof was complete by day three of the run and was accepted by the Lean proof assistant. It also says the system then improved the result twice on related open problems, with Lean accepting the final version. We only have the claim as relayed by the Import AI newsletter, which links to PSI's own blog. The extraction found no primary links, and the proof has not been confirmed by an outside mathematician.

02

Why it matters

If the proof holds, it would be a notable example of an AI system settling a named open problem in theoretical computer science. Lean acceptance is a strong check on whether the proof is logically valid, so this is not a vague claim. The people most affected are mathematicians and theoretical computer scientists, plus AI labs competing on research capability. There is no product or deployment here, so the near-term practical impact is limited. The bigger open questions are how much human steering went into the run and whether the result can be repeated.

03

What is noise

The "taste of the singularity" line and the claim that this settles "one of the most fundamental questions in quantum computing" are framing from the newsletter author and the startup, not findings. A Lean-checked proof shows the argument is valid for the statement as formalised. It does not show the formal statement matches the conjecture as the field understands it, and it says nothing about how autonomous the process was. The Meta tactile glove paper and the 2016 NASA paper in the same issue are unrelated to this event.

04

Watch next

  1. 01Comments from Scott Aaronson, Andris Ambainis or other quantum complexity researchers on whether the Lean formalisation matches the actual conjecture.
  2. 02Release of the Lean files and a written paper (for example on arXiv) so others can check the proof and see how much human guidance was involved.
  3. 03Whether PSI or others reproduce the approach on other open problems within the next few months, and whether Anthropic comments on the non-public model involved.

Coverage

1 story

Newsletter

Get the no-hype AI news straight to your inbox

Weekly. No spam, unsubscribe any time. Privacy

More capability signals

Full feed →