Signum
Feed
Useful signal5 Nov 2026high confidence

Google releases Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash with 15-second video generation, multi-turn editing and 30% lower price, generally available

Edited by · written with AI from the linked sources (how)

Google made Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash generally available across the Gemini API, Google Cloud/Gemini for business, Google Vids and Flow. It supports native video generation and editing up to 15 seconds (up from 10 in Omni 1.1), with duration set in one-second steps from 3 to 15 seconds. Other changes: multi-turn conversational editing, better reference adherence (character, product and style images, motion clips up to 3 seconds, audio cues), improved lip-sync and multi-speaker dialogue, and fewer jump cuts in camera moves. Price is cut 30% versus Omni 1.1, to $0.07 per second for 720p. Output can be upscaled to 1080p or 4K, Provisioned Throughput is available, and outputs carry a SynthID watermark. This is the first time Gemini Omni has been generally available.

CapabilityEconomicsAccessAdoption

Entities: Google, Google DeepMind, Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash, Gemini Omni 1.1, Gemini API, Google Vids

67Useful signal
1 source
1 primary
Was this useful?
01

What happened

Google made Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash generally available in the Gemini API, Google Cloud/Gemini for business, Google Vids and Flow. It is the first generally available release of the Omni line. Maximum clip length rises from 10 to 15 seconds, set in one-second steps from 3 to 15. Price falls 30% against Omni 1.1, to $0.07 per second at 720p. Other changes are multi-turn conversational editing, better adherence to reference images, motion clips and audio cues, improved lip-sync and fewer jump cuts. Output can be upscaled to 1080p or 4K, Provisioned Throughput is offered, and outputs carry a SynthID watermark.

02

Why it matters

Developers and businesses can now build on Omni with production-grade availability rather than preview terms. At $0.07 per second, a full 15-second 720p clip costs roughly $1.05 before upscaling, which makes iteration cheaper but does not make large volumes free. Editing a clip without regenerating it could cut wasted spend, if it works as described. Competing video-model vendors face a lower price reference point, though nothing here shows Google has pulled clearly ahead. The effect on video and marketing workers is plausible but unmeasured.

03

What is noise

Claims of better consistency, reference adherence and lip-sync come only from Google, with no independent tests or side-by-side comparisons offered. "At scale" is marketing language, and the 30% cut is against Google's own earlier model, not rivals. Google itself concedes limits in fast sports action, rapid script changes and complex physics, so treat this as an incremental point release, not a step change. The price for 1080p and 4K upscaling is not stated in the extraction.

04

Watch next

  1. 01Independent side-by-side tests of Omni 1.2 Flash against rival video models on consistency, lip-sync and multi-turn edits, especially the known weak spots (sports, physics)
  2. 02Real per-clip cost including 1080p/4K upscaling, rate limits and Provisioned Throughput pricing once developers publish bills, to check whether the 30% cut holds in practice
  3. 03Competitor price responses or new releases from other video-model providers over the next 4 to 8 weeks, and any developer adoption signals such as API usage or product integrations

Coverage

1 story

Newsletter

Get the no-hype AI news straight to your inbox

Weekly. No spam, unsubscribe any time. Privacy

More capability signals

Full feed →