Signum
Feed
Useful signal13 Oct 2026high confidence

Liquid AI releases open-weight LFM2.5-24B-A2B, a 24B-parameter MoE reasoning model with 2B active parameters, for on-device agents

Liquid AI published open weights for LFM2.5-24B-A2B and LFM2.5-24B-A2B-Base on Hugging Face. The model is a reasoning-only MoE (40 layers, 64 experts, top-4 routing) with a context window extended from 32K to 131K tokens and a vocabulary doubled from 65K to 128K. Pre-training grew from ~17T to ~33T tokens, with 2T tokens of mid-training at 32K context and 300B tokens at 131K context. Post-training included SFT, teacher specialization, two MOPD stages and agentic RL in harnesses such as OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, Pi and OpenCode. Day-one support covers llama.cpp, MLX, vLLM, SGLang and ONNX. Liquid AI's own benchmarks show it leading or matching Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it and Nemotron-3.5-Lightning on several tool-use and instruction-following tests. For example, it scores 48.09 vs 38.19 on LiveClaw and 27.69 vs 8.72 on AutomationBench. It trails on knowledge and coding benchmarks (GPQA Diamond 74.42 vs 83.69; SWE-Bench Verified (OpenCode) 51.00 vs 66.20 for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B). Reported speeds are 184 tok/s on an Apple M5 Max, 114 tok/s on a Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and over 21K output tok/s on a single B300.

CapabilityAccessInfrastructureAdoption

Entities: Liquid AI, LFM2.5-24B-A2B, LFM2.5-24B-A2B-Base, LFM2-24B-A2B, Hugging Face, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

71Useful signal
1 source
1 primary
Was this useful?
01

What happened

Liquid AI published open weights for LFM2.5-24B-A2B and a Base variant on Hugging Face. It is a reasoning-only mixture-of-experts model (40 layers, 64 experts, top-4 routing) with 24B total and about 2B active parameters. Context grew from 32K to 131K tokens, the vocabulary doubled from 65K to 128K, and pre-training rose from roughly 17T to 33T tokens. Day-one support covers llama.cpp, MLX, vLLM, SGLang and ONNX, with reported speeds of 184 tok/s on an Apple M5 Max and 114 tok/s on a Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

02

Why it matters

Developers building local or private agents get another small, fast option that runs on high-end laptops and mini-PCs with mainstream tooling, so it can be tested straight away. The reported gains are strongest on tool use and instruction following (for example 27.69 vs 8.72 on AutomationBench), which is what agent workloads need. It is weaker on knowledge and coding (GPQA Diamond 74.42 vs 83.69; SWE-Bench Verified 51.00 vs 66.20 against Qwen3.6-35B-A3B), so it suits narrow automation better than general-purpose or coding work. The effect is incremental for teams already using on-device models, not a shift in who leads the field.

03

What is noise

"Best-in-class" and "competitive with models about 50% larger" rest entirely on Liquid AI's own benchmarks, run with harnesses and settings it chose, and the comparison table omits or concedes the areas where it loses. The speed figures come from top-end hardware (M5 Max, B300), so they say little about typical consumer devices. It is also an upgrade on the earlier LFM2-24B-A2B, not a new class of model.

04

Watch next

  1. 01Independent evaluations (for example third-party leaderboards or community reruns) of tool-use and agent tasks such as LiveClaw and AutomationBench, to see if the lead over Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Gemma-4-26B-A4B holds outside Liquid AI's setup
  2. 02Hugging Face download counts, fine-tunes and quantised variants over the next 4 to 6 weeks, plus user reports of real-world speed and memory use on mid-range hardware
  3. 03Whether any product or enterprise deployment adopts it for on-device agents, and any licence terms that limit commercial use, as the model card should be checked before building on it

Evidence

1 linked

Coverage

1 story

Newsletter

Get the no-hype AI news straight to your inbox

Weekly. No spam, unsubscribe any time. Privacy

More capability signals

Full feed →